1989 Audi 100 vs. 1984 Lotus Etna
To start off, 1989 Audi 100 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1989 Audi 100. (163 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 1989 Audi 100.
Because 1984 Lotus Etna is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Lotus Etna. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Audi 100. (235 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi 100 | 1984 Lotus Etna | |
Make | Audi | Lotus |
Model | 100 | Etna |
Year Released | 1989 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 3946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 331 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 408 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2520 mm |