1989 Audi 100 vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Audi 100 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (5 cylinders), 1989 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1989 Audi 100. (70 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 1989 Audi 100.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Audi 100. (125 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Audi 100. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 1989 Audi 100 has manual transmission. 1989 Audi 100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi 100 | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | 100 | CU-X |
Year Released | 1989 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1986 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 80 L |