1989 Audi 100 vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Audi 100 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1989 Audi 100. (118 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1989 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 444 kg more than 1989 Audi 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Audi 100. (266 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi 100 | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | 100 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1989 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2460 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 266 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.5 mm | 87 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1764 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 78 L |