1989 Audi 100 vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Audi 100 would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 1989 Audi 100. (134 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1989 Audi 100.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 349 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Audi 100. (187 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi 100 | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 100 | CTS |
Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 5965 cc |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 536 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 64 L |