1989 Audi 100 vs. 2006 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Audi 100 would be higher. At 2,499 cc, 2006 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Audi 100 (90 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (78 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Because 2006 Isuzu KB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Isuzu KB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu KB (170 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Audi 100. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu KB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi 100 | 2006 Isuzu KB | |
Make | Audi | Isuzu |
Model | 100 | KB |
Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2499 cc |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 18.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 76 L |