1989 Audi 100 vs. 2008 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Audi 100 would be higher. At 2,987 cc, 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1110 kg more than 1989 Audi 100.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Audi 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Audi 100. (167 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Audi 100. 2008 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 1989 Audi 100 has manual transmission. 1989 Audi 100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi 100 | 2008 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | 100 | Commander |
Year Released | 1989 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2370 cc | 2987 cc |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 510 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 2410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 2270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2790 mm |