1989 Audi 200 vs. 1965 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1989 Audi 200 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1989 Audi 200. (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1989 Audi 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 635 kg more than 1989 Audi 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Audi 200 | 1965 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | 200 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 95 L |
