1989 Audi 200 vs. 1965 Mini MK I
To start off, 1989 Audi 200 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mini MK I would be higher. At 2,226 cc (5 cylinders), 1989 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Audi 200 (136 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1965 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1965 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Audi 200 weights approximately 675 kg more than 1965 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Audi 200 (188 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1989 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi 200 | 1965 Mini MK I | |
Make | Audi | Mini |
Model | 200 | MK I |
Year Released | 1989 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 846 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 136 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 60 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2040 mm |