1989 Audi 200 vs. 2002 BMW M3
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Audi 200 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 264 more horse power than 1989 Audi 200. (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1989 Audi 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Audi 200 weights approximately 380 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Because 2002 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Audi 200. (253 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi 200 | 2002 BMW M3 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | 200 | M3 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 3997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 444 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 253 Nm | 480 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1100 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2890 mm |