1989 Audi 200 vs. 2003 Isuzu D-MAX
To start off, 2003 Isuzu D-MAX is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Isuzu D-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Audi 200 (136 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2003 Isuzu D-MAX. (129 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2003 Isuzu D-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Isuzu D-MAX weights approximately 558 kg more than 1989 Audi 200.
Because 2003 Isuzu D-MAX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Audi 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Isuzu D-MAX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Isuzu D-MAX (300 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Audi 200. (188 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Isuzu D-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi 200 | 2003 Isuzu D-MAX | |
Make | Audi | Isuzu |
Model | 200 | D-MAX |
Year Released | 1989 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 136 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1848 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3060 mm |