1989 Audi 200 vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix

To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,226 cc (5 cylinders), 1989 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Audi 200 (136 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2011 Toyota Matrix.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Audi 200 (188 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1989 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Toyota Matrix. 2011 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 1989 Audi 200 has manual transmission. 1989 Audi 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Audi 200 2011 Toyota Matrix
Make Audi Toyota
Model 200 Matrix
Year Released 1989 2011
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2226 cc 1800 cc
Engine Cylinders 5 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 136 HP 132 HP
Engine RPM 5700 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 188 Nm 173 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4400 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4810 mm 4366 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1765 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1549 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 2601 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 50 L