1989 Audi 200 vs. 2012 Volvo C70
To start off, 2012 Volvo C70 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C70 weights approximately 450 kg more than 1989 Audi 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C70 (400 Nm @ 1250 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Audi 200. (188 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Audi 200. 2012 Volvo C70 has automatic transmission and 1989 Audi 200 has manual transmission. 1989 Audi 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo C70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi 200 | 2012 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Audi | Volvo |
Model | 200 | C70 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 136 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 188 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 60 L |