1989 Audi 80 vs. 1941 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1989 Audi 80 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Cadillac 62 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1989 Audi 80. (67 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1941 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1989 Audi 80.
Because 1941 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi 80 | 1941 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 80 | 62 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1941 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1895 cc | 5676 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 5490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3210 mm |