1989 Audi 80 vs. 1961 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1989 Audi 80 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Reliant Sabre Six (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1989 Audi 80. (67 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Reliant Sabre Six should accelerate faster than 1989 Audi 80.
Because 1961 Reliant Sabre Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Reliant Sabre Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Reliant Sabre Six (186 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Audi 80. (129 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1961 Reliant Sabre Six will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi 80 | 1961 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | Audi | Reliant |
Model | 80 | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 1989 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1895 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 129 Nm | 186 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2290 mm |