1989 Audi 80 vs. 1967 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1989 Audi 80 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,895 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Audi 80 (67 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1967 Ford 12 M. (44 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford 12 M.
Because 1967 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Audi 80 (129 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford 12 M. (80 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1989 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Audi 80 | 1967 Ford 12 M | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | 80 | 12 M |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1895 cc | 1183 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 129 Nm | 80 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2530 mm |
