1989 Audi 80 vs. 1967 Simca 1200S
To start off, 1989 Audi 80 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Simca 1200S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Simca 1200S would be higher. At 1,895 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Simca 1200S (79 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1989 Audi 80. (67 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Simca 1200S should accelerate faster than 1989 Audi 80.
Because 1967 Simca 1200S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Simca 1200S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Audi 80 (129 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Simca 1200S. (103 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1989 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Simca 1200S.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Audi 80 | 1967 Simca 1200S | |
| Make | Audi | Simca |
| Model | 80 | 1200S |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1895 cc | 1204 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 129 Nm | 103 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2240 mm |
