1989 Audi 80 vs. 1982 Plymouth Caravelle
To start off, 1989 Audi 80 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Plymouth Caravelle would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Plymouth Caravelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Plymouth Caravelle (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1989 Audi 80. (67 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Plymouth Caravelle should accelerate faster than 1989 Audi 80.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Plymouth Caravelle (159 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Audi 80. (129 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1982 Plymouth Caravelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi 80 | 1982 Plymouth Caravelle | |
Make | Audi | Plymouth |
Model | 80 | Caravelle |
Year Released | 1989 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1895 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 129 Nm | 159 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2630 mm |