1989 Audi 80 vs. 1995 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 1995 Jaguar XJS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Audi 80 would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Jaguar XJS (220 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1989 Audi 80. (67 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 1989 Audi 80.
Because 1995 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Jaguar XJS (377 Nm @ 3650 RPM) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Audi 80. (129 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1995 Jaguar XJS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi 80 | 1995 Jaguar XJS | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | 80 | XJS |
Year Released | 1989 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1895 cc | 3980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 129 Nm | 377 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3650 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2600 mm |