1989 Audi 80 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,895 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Colt (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1989 Audi 80. (67 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1989 Audi 80.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Colt (138 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Audi 80. (129 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi 80 | 1996 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | 80 | Colt |
Year Released | 1989 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1895 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 129 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2430 mm |