1989 Audi 80 vs. 1996 Vector M12
To start off, 1996 Vector M12 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Audi 80 would be higher. At 5,707 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Vector M12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Vector M12 (484 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 417 more horse power than 1989 Audi 80. (67 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Vector M12 should accelerate faster than 1989 Audi 80.
Because 1996 Vector M12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Vector M12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Vector M12 (576 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 447 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Audi 80. (129 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1996 Vector M12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Audi 80 | 1996 Vector M12 | |
| Make | Audi | Vector |
| Model | 80 | M12 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1895 cc | 5707 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 484 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 129 Nm | 576 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2750 mm |
