1989 Audi 80 vs. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,895 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (74 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1989 Audi 80. (67 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 should accelerate faster than 1989 Audi 80.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Audi 80. (129 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Audi 80. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 has automatic transmission and 1989 Audi 80 has manual transmission. 1989 Audi 80 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Audi 80 | 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | |
| Make | Audi | Chrysler |
| Model | 80 | ESX 3 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1895 cc | 1499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 129 Nm | 332 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3000 mm |
