1989 Audi 80 vs. 2000 Ford Puma
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1989 Audi 80. (74 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1989 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 255 kg more than 1989 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Puma (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Audi 80. (121 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi 80 | 2000 Ford Puma | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 80 | Puma |
Year Released | 1989 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1679 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 121 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2450 mm |