1989 Audi 80 vs. 2000 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2000 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Audi 80 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 776 more horse power than 1989 Audi 80. (67 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1989 Audi 80.
Because 2000 Lotec C 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotec C 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 861 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Audi 80. (129 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2000 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Audi 80 | 2000 Lotec C 1000 | |
| Make | Audi | Lotec |
| Model | 80 | C 1000 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1895 cc | 5500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 843 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 129 Nm | 990 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1150 mm |
