1989 Audi 80 vs. 2002 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2002 Nissan Cima is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Audi 80 would be higher. At 4,498 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Audi 80 | 2002 Nissan Cima | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | 80 | Cima |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1895 cc | 4498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1500 mm |
