1989 Audi 80 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1989 Audi 80. (74 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1989 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 280 kg more than 1989 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Audi 80. (121 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Audi 80 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | 80 | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 121 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2490 mm |
