1989 Audi 80 vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,957 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (252 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1989 Audi 80. (67 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1989 Audi 80.
Because 2005 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Clio (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Audi 80. (129 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi 80 | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Audi | Renault |
Model | 80 | Clio |
Year Released | 1989 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1895 cc | 2957 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 7150 RPM |
Torque | 129 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4650 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2480 mm |