1989 Audi 80 vs. 2011 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2011 Smart ForTwo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,895 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Smart ForTwo (70 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1989 Audi 80. (67 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1989 Audi 80.
Because 2011 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Audi 80 (129 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Smart ForTwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1989 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Audi 80 | 2011 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Audi | Smart |
| Model | 80 | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1895 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 129 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 1867 mm |
