1989 Audi 80 vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (156 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1989 Audi 80. (67 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1989 Audi 80.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Matrix (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Audi 80. (129 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi 80 | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 80 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1989 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1895 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 129 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2600 mm |