1989 Audi 90 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Audi 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Audi 90 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1989 Audi 90. (114 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1989 Audi 90.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Audi 90. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Audi 90. (172 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Audi 90.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi 90 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 90 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 4016 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 206 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 324 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3010 mm |