1989 Audi 90 vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Audi 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Audi 90 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1989 Audi 90. (136 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1989 Audi 90.
Because 1989 Audi 90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Audi 90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Audi 90. (188 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Audi 90.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi 90 | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 90 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2308 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 136 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2601 mm |