1989 Audi Coupe vs. 1983 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1989 Audi Coupe is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,226 cc (5 cylinders), 1989 Audi Coupe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Audi Coupe (134 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Audi Coupe should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jeep CJ weights approximately 120 kg more than 1989 Audi Coupe.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Audi Coupe. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Audi Coupe (188 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1989 Audi Coupe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi Coupe | 1983 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | Coupe | CJ |
Year Released | 1989 | 1983 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2380 mm |