1989 Audi Coupe vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 1989 Audi Coupe is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,226 cc (5 cylinders), 1989 Audi Coupe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1989 Audi Coupe. (134 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1989 Audi Coupe.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Audi Coupe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Audi Coupe | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
| Make | Audi | Caterham |
| Model | Coupe | 1700 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 1692 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 36 L |
