1989 Audi V8 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1989 Audi V8 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 430 kg more than 1989 Audi V8.
Because 1989 Audi V8 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Audi V8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Audi V8 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | V8 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3562 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 2140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 79 L |
