1989 Audi V8 vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1989 Audi V8 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,562 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Audi V8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Audi V8 (251 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 225 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Audi V8 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Audi V8 weights approximately 1044 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1989 Audi V8 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Audi V8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi V8 | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Audi | DAF |
Model | V8 | Daffodil |
Year Released | 1989 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3562 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 666 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 33 L |