1989 Austin Maestro vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1989 Austin Maestro is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1989 Austin Maestro. (66 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1989 Austin Maestro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 255 kg more than 1989 Austin Maestro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Austin Maestro. (102 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1965 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Austin Maestro.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Austin Maestro | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Austin | Triumph |
Model | Maestro | 2000 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 64 L |