1989 Austin Maestro vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1989 Austin Maestro is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Austin Maestro (66 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Austin Maestro should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Austin Maestro weights approximately 145 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1989 Austin Maestro (102 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1989 Austin Maestro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Austin Maestro | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Austin | Zastava |
| Model | Maestro | 102 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2160 mm |
