1989 BMW 750 vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2005 Nissan Armada is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 BMW 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 BMW 750 would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1989 BMW 750. (295 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1989 BMW 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 588 kg more than 1989 BMW 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 BMW 750. (450 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 BMW 750.
Compare all specifications:
1989 BMW 750 | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | 750 | Armada |
Year Released | 1989 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4988 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 2388 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.9 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.8 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 120 L | 106 L |