1989 BMW 750 vs. 2009 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2009 Nissan Murano is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 BMW 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 BMW 750 would be higher. At 4,988 cc (12 cylinders), 1989 BMW 750 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 BMW 750 (295 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Murano. (261 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 BMW 750 should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Murano.
Because 1989 BMW 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 BMW 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Murano, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 BMW 750 (450 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Murano. (248 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1989 BMW 750 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Murano.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 BMW 750 | 2009 Nissan Murano | |
| Make | BMW | Nissan |
| Model | 750 | Murano |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4988 cc | 3498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 295 HP | 261 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 248 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1890 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.9 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 19.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
