1989 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 1952 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1989 Bristol Beaufighter is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Bristol Beaufighter weights approximately 640 kg more than 1952 Jeep CJ3A.
Because 1952 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Bristol Beaufighter. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1989 Bristol Beaufighter has automatic transmission and 1952 Jeep CJ3A has manual transmission. 1952 Jeep CJ3A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Bristol Beaufighter will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Bristol Beaufighter | 1952 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | Bristol | Jeep |
Model | Beaufighter | CJ3A |
Year Released | 1989 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2040 mm |