1989 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 9,371 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Bristol Beaufighter weights approximately 563 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Bristol Beaufighter | 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
| Model | Beaufighter | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 9371 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 770 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1187 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2570 mm |
