1989 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Bristol Beaufighter weights approximately 770 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio.
Because 1989 Bristol Beaufighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Bristol Beaufighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1989 Bristol Beaufighter has automatic transmission and 2003 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2003 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Bristol Beaufighter will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Bristol Beaufighter | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Bristol | Renault |
Model | Beaufighter | Clio |
Year Released | 1989 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 73 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2480 mm |