1989 Buick Reatta vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Buick Reatta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Buick Reatta would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Buick Reatta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Buick Reatta (165 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (158 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Buick Reatta should accelerate faster than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Buick Reatta (285 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (219 Nm). This means 1989 Buick Reatta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Buick Reatta | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Buick | Toyota |
Model | Reatta | Matrix |
Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3800 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 219 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 50 L |