1989 Buick Regal vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 1989 Buick Regal is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Buick Regal weights approximately 206 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Buick Regal | 1963 Holden EJ | |
| Make | Buick | Holden |
| Model | Regal | EJ |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 64 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1134 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2680 mm |
