1989 Buick Regal vs. 1996 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1996 Ford Falcon is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Buick Regal would be higher. At 3,707 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Falcon weights approximately 240 kg more than 1989 Buick Regal.
Because 1996 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Buick Regal | 1996 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | Regal | Falcon |
Year Released | 1989 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 3707 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 228 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2800 mm |