1989 Buick Regal vs. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Buick Regal would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1100 kg more than 1989 Buick Regal.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Buick Regal. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Buick Regal | 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Buick | Land Rover |
| Model | Regal | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 4398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 2440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2550 mm |
