1989 Buick Regal vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Buick Regal would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Buick Regal weights approximately 600 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2003 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Buick Regal | 2003 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Buick | MCC |
Model | Regal | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1989 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 1810 mm |