1989 Buick Regal vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Buick Regal would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 575 kg more than 1989 Buick Regal.
Because 2011 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Buick Regal | 2011 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | Regal | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 556 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1455 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2880 mm |
