1989 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1966 Mercury Comet
To start off, 1989 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 6,393 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (405 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 316 more horse power than 1989 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 1989 Buick Skyhawk.
Because 1966 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Buick Skyhawk | 1966 Mercury Comet | |
| Make | Buick | Mercury |
| Model | Skyhawk | Comet |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 6393 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 405 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2950 mm |
