1989 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1983 Volvo 240
To start off, 1989 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,315 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1983 Volvo 240. (81 HP @ 4650 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1983 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Volvo 240 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1989 Buick Skyhawk.
Because 1983 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Buick Skyhawk | 1983 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Buick | Volvo |
Model | Skyhawk | 240 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2315 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4650 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2660 mm |