1989 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1990 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 1990 Skoda Rapid R is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1990 Skoda Rapid R. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1990 Skoda Rapid R. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 230 kg more than 1990 Skoda Rapid R. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1990 Skoda Rapid R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Skoda Rapid R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Buick Skyhawk | 1990 Skoda Rapid R | |
| Make | Buick | Skoda |
| Model | Skyhawk | Rapid R |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 62 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2410 mm |
